Note that this durability also translates to mechanical shutter life while the 6D is rated at a decent 100,000 actuations, Canon promises 150,000 actuations on the 7D. My 7D has handled a lot and has come through without a hitch or a scratch.īut while my 6D is still working well, I always hesitate before subjecting it to adverse weather. I’ve used both these cameras extensively, in both good and bad weather. While it doesn’t weigh significantly more than the 6D (860g/30 oz), and it isn’t significantly bigger (148 x 111 x 74mm), its body is made of magnesium alloy, offering a level of durability that the 6D can’t match. The Canon 7D, on the other hand, feels like a beast. It clocks in at around 770 g (27 oz), with a 148 x 111 x 74mm body.Īnd while the 6D’s body feels well-built, and does come with weather sealing, it’s pretty plasticky overall. The Canon 6D and the Canon 7D are two very different animals, and this becomes clear the moment you hold them both in your hands.ĭespite its larger sensor, the Canon 6D is a relatively compact, lightweight camera. But with its relatively low price tag for a full-frame camera, this model will surely draw attention to anyone wanting to step up to this level of quality without breaking the bank to do so.Editor's Choice 1. With a full-frame sensor and 20 megapixels, it should come as no surprise that the Canon 6D prints look excellent in comparison to all but the best cameras out there today.
#Canon 5d mark iii vs 6d vs 7d iso#
ISO 102,400 does not print a usable 4 x 6 and is best avoided. ISO 51,200 prints a good 4 x 6, if just a bit on the grainy size. ISO 25,600 makes a nice 5 x 7 inch print. ISO 12,800 prints a good 8 x 10, though is starting to introduce some loss in color fidelity and a bit more noise in some shadowy areas. ISO 6400 yields a good 11 x 14 inch print, with good color renditioning for such a high ISO. ISO 3200 prints a very nice 13 x 19, with 16 x 20s losing some contrast in our mosaic bottle but still fine for wall display prints. ISO 1600 makes an excellent 16 x 20 inch print, while 20 x 30s here show some noticeable loss of contrast in our target red swatch. ISO 800 prints remain sharp up to 20 x 30, introducing some minor luminance noise in shadows and softness in our red swatch at 24 x 36 inches but still quite usable for less critical applications. ISO 400 prints look great at 24 x 36 inches, crisp and vibrant, and are fine for wall display up to 36 x 48. Makes a nice wall display print up to 40 x 60. ISO 50/100/200 images look terrific at 30 x 40, with sharp detail and rich colors. Stunning 30 x 40s at ISO 50/100/200 an excellent 16 x 20 at ISO 1600 and a good 5 x 7 all the way to ISO 25,600. Overall the Canon 6D performs admirably here, and tends to be a bit sharper across the ISO range than most of its competitors, with the 5D Mark III being the only exception and clearly better in the details. High-contrast detail is also important, pushing the camera in different ways, so we like to look at it, too. As with ISO 1600, the 6D clearly wins the battle for ISO supremacy against the Sony A99 in virtually all respects.ĭetail: Canon 6D versus Canon 7D, Canon 5D Mark III, Nikon D600, Nikon D800 and Sony A99.ĭetail comparison.
0 kommentar(er)
